HOW TO STOP WORRYING ABOUT COMPOUND MODIFIERS

In the world of writing, one aspect that often leaves writers and editors scratching their heads is the use of hyphens in compound modifiers. Should they be hyphenated or left open? The answer is not always clear-cut, and understanding the guidelines can help you navigate this linguistic maze. In this article, we will explore the importance of hyphenating compound modifiers, the factors to consider when making these decisions, and the quest for consistency amidst varying opinions.

What are Compound Modifiers?

Compound modifiers are noun phrases used adjectivally before another noun, such as “civil rights movement,” “orange juice carton,” “income tax laws,” or “high school students.” These familiar examples can be perplexing when it comes to hyphenation, and that’s where the decision-making process begins.

The Hyphenation Dilemma

There are different schools of thought when it comes to hyphenation. Some publications adhere to a strict style that hyphenates all compound modifiers, resulting in a neat and consistent approach. On the other hand, some advocate for leaving all compounds open, regardless of capitalization or origin, following the “peanut butter rule.” However, most editors find themselves making case-by-case decisions based on factors like term familiarity and the potential for confusion.

Considering Familiarity and Clarity

The familiarity of a compound depends on the subject matter and the intended audience. Hyphenating terms that are commonly used in a specific field may appear out of place to readers in that field. However, in writing for a broader audience, leaving such terms open when they could cause confusion does not enhance the credibility of your writing. Striking the right balance between familiarity and clarity is crucial.

Exceptions and Ambiguity

Certain styles hyphenate most compound modifiers but make exceptions for those that are widely recognized. For instance, the term “civil rights” is well-known, making it unlikely that readers would misunderstand a “rights movement” as always being polite. On the other hand, some styles default to leaving compounds open but hyphenate those that could genuinely confuse readers. A classic example is “banana bread pudding” – does it consist of banana bread or does it merely contain banana slices? Hyphenation can help resolve such ambiguities.

The Consistency Conundrum

One concern that often arises is the potential for inconsistency. However, it’s important to realize that readers may not prioritize consistency as much as editors do, and even among editors, opinions on consistency can vary. The key is to strike a balance between a logical system and clarity for the intended audience. While some approaches may seem inconsistent to others, it is crucial not to get lost in the pursuit of absolute consistency and lose sight of other essential aspects of writing.

Navigating the world of hyphenating compound modifiers requires a keen understanding of the subject matter, the intended audience, and the potential for ambiguity. While guidelines exist, they may not cover every scenario, and editors often need to make individual decisions. Striving for consistency is important but not at the cost of clarity and understanding. By striking the right balance, you can ensure your writing is authoritative and accessible to your readers. So, embrace the art of hyphenation and let your words shine!